The ‘Please Don’t Buy Palworld’ Controversy Explained

Palworld has been a controversial game since it was first revealed and hit with the “Pokemon but with guns” description. It’s no secret that Palworld draws heavy inspiration from Pokemon in its creature design and some gameplay mechanics, resulting in a lawsuit from Nintendo that developer Pocketpair is still embroiled in over a year later. Whether Pocketpair has infringed on any patents will ultimately be up to the courts to decide, but the gaming community—including some developers—has been weighing in on the conversation in the meantime.

Recently, former Capcom developer Yoshiki Okamoto released a video on his YouTube channel that takes a hard stance against Palworld and its ongoing lawsuit with Nintendo. He believes the fact that Palworld is currently being sued makes it unacceptable to play until a settlement has been reached, and that “by playing it (Palworld), you are supporting it. So please don’t buy it.” This call to action against purchasing Palworld has spurred debate among fans, drawing criticism against Okamoto as a result.

Although not presently working as a developer, Okamoto has a storied 40-year career in the gaming industry and is currently the chairman of the Japan Game Culture Foundation. Having worked for companies like Konami and Capcom, as well as founding studios like Flagship and Game Republic, Okamoto has played key roles in the development of titles like:

Gyruss (1982) — Konami

Time Pilot (1983) — Konami

1942 (1984) — Capcom

Gun.Smoke (1985) — Capcom

Final Fight (1989) — Capcom

Street Fighter 2 (1991) — Capcom

Resident Evil (1996) — Capcom

As an industry veteran with such a notable pedigree of games, Okamoto’s statements against Palworld have not been taken lightly. In this video, Okamoto asserts that there are two camps regarding Palworld: fans and haters, and that he is in the anti-Palworld camp despite having the game recommended to him many times. While Okamoto is using his YouTube platform and status as an icon of the industry to call for a boycott of the game until the lawsuit is settled, fans and YouTube users have pushed back over his assertion that Palworld has “crossed a line.”

Palworld’s Ongoing Legal Battle with Nintendo Has Sparked Controversy

The lawsuit Nintendo has filed against Palworld has already received its own share of criticism from fans and the gaming community as a whole. Rather than suing for copyright infringement on Pals that look like specific Pokemon, Nintendo is instead asserting that Palworld violates game mechanics it has patented, including rideable mounts as well as capture and release mechanics. While no settlement has been reached in this lawsuit, Okamoto still believes that Palworld has crossed a line that could open the door to other Nintendo properties being copied, potentially even with the use of generative AI.

In response, Palworld fans have pointed out issues with patents harming the creativity of smaller developers, suggesting that a company like Nintendo shouldn’t be able to prevent developers from iterating upon established game mechanics and ideas. Additionally, fans have been quick to point out that Okamoto’s concerns over generative AI are only feeding into the debunked rumor that Pocketpair used the technology to develop Palworld.

Palworld’s 1.0 Release May Come with Cause for Concern

With this legal dispute unlikely to be resolved until mid-2026 at the earliest, Palworld’s 1.0 release plans could still be caught up in the controversy of this lawsuit, as Pocketpair aims to bring the game out of early access in the coming year. Okamoto states his concern that if Palworld wins the lawsuit and successfully launches its version 1.0, then infringement could become more acceptable if it leads to a game becoming popular. However, he also notes that “if a settlement is reached with Nintendo, then I think it’s officially a game that everyone can play,” which seems to align with his belief that gamers should not purchase Palworld while the lawsuit is ongoing, but wait until it has been settled before seeing if it is acceptable to support the game.

Given the vocal support Palworld is getting in the comments of Okamoto’s video, fans are seemingly unbothered by the fact that the game is tied up in legal proceedings. Okamoto believes Pocketpair is “rushing things a bit with this official release” by continuing to sell the game in early access while the lawsuit is ongoing. Palworld has changed some mechanics in the game, such as replacing certain Pals with Gliders that players can use, not out of admission of guilt, but simply as a precaution if Pocketpair loses the lawsuit and is liable for damages. Until the lawsuit from Nintendo is resolved, fans may not know how Palworld’s 1.0 release will be affected further.